Indexing, Abstracting and Discoverability
The International Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal “ONE” is indexed, archived, and discoverable through a number of scholarly databases, discovery services, library catalogues, and research infrastructure platforms.
The information provided on this page is intended to ensure transparency regarding the journal’s bibliographic presence, discoverability, metadata dissemination, and long-term accessibility. The journal does not use journal-level metrics or third-party ranking indicators as the sole measure of publication quality and does not endorse unreliable indexing or evaluation services.
This page is regularly updated to reflect the journal’s current presence in relevant scholarly, library, and open science systems.
Publication Ethics
Statement on Ethical Conduct and Misconduct in Publishing
International Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal “ONE” upholds the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and maintains the highest standards of ethical conduct in publishing.
To maintain the publication ethics we strongly believe in strictly following the set guidelines at four different levels to achieve transparency at our level.
1. AUTHORS:
The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original, and if the work of others has been used, it has been appropriately acknowledged at respective places. Plagiarism in all its forms is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical behavior and should be avoided. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the submitted research paper and its onward submission to the journal for publication.
Responsibilities of Authors:
- Authors should present an accurate account of their data. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to the work. Fraudulent or inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
- The authors should ensure that they have submitted their original works, and if the authors have used the work of others, it has been appropriately cited. Plagiarism in all its forms is totally unacceptable.
- An author should not publish manuscripts describing the same research work in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal constitutes unethical behavior, which is unacceptable.
- Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be reported as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
- When an author notices inaccuracy in their own published work, it is the author’s duty to promptly notify the editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Authors must disclose any financial, personal, or professional relationships that could inappropriately influence (or appear to influence) their research or its interpretation. This includes funding sources, employment affiliations, or personal connections. Authors are required to declare these conflicts in their manuscript at the time of submission.
Information about conflicts of interest will be reviewed by the editorial team and published in the final article in the ‘Conflicts of Interest’ section (as part of the unified declarations/metadata block), to ensure transparency for readers and stakeholders.
Research Ethics for Studies Involving Human Participants: This requirement applies only to publications that involve research with human or animal participants. Studies in other fields, such as economics, management, law, tourism, or theoretical research, do not require ethical approval.
For studies involving human or animal participants, the following requirements must be met:
- The research received approval from a recognized ethics committee, including the name of the committee and reference number.
- Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.
- Measures were taken to ensure anonymity and privacy of participants, where applicable.
Authors may be asked to provide documentation verifying compliance with these ethical requirements during the review process. Non-compliance with these ethical guidelines will result in the rejection of the manuscript. The editorial board also reserves the right to retract published manuscripts if ethical violations are identified after publication.
Data Integrity and Availability: Authors are expected to ensure the integrity of the data presented in their manuscripts. Where appropriate, authors may be requested to provide access to the underlying data supporting the results of their research in order to facilitate editorial review and verification.
2. EDITORS: An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor’s own research without the written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Duties of Editors:
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, citizenship, or political connections of the authors.
The editor must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the consent of the author information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
An editor should take measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher. Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration to the respective complaint or claims made. If the complaint is upheld, this may result in the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as appropriate.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Editors must disclose any financial, personal, or professional conflicts of interest that could influence their editorial decisions and recuse themselves from handling such manuscripts.
Editorial Independence: Editors make decisions regarding publication based solely on the scholarly merit of manuscripts and their relevance to the journal’s scope. Editorial decisions are not influenced by the publisher or any external interests.
3. REVIEWERS: Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Reviewers:
Peer review process assists the editor in making their final decisions and through the editorial communications with the author also assists in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
All the manuscripts received for peer review process must be treated as confidential.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting things.
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest, including financial, personal, or professional connections, and recuse themselves if they feel unable to provide an impartial review.
Timeliness of Reviews: Reviewers are expected to complete their reviews within the agreed time frame. If a reviewer is unable to provide a review within the requested period, they should notify the editor and decline the invitation.
4. PUBLISHER: Plagiarism is considered to be a serious breach of scientific ethics by the entire scientific community. Incidents of plagiarism in a manuscript whether detected, will be dealt seriously. We constantly advise and take suggestions from our editorial Board/Reviewers for avoiding any malpractice of publication ethics. As part of the journal’s commitment to publication ethics, manuscripts are subject to similarity assessment during the editorial evaluation process in order to identify potential overlap, duplication, or other forms of textual similarity.
Additionally, we have established procedures for post-publication discussion, correction, and retraction in accordance with COPE guidelines. We encourage authors, readers, and other stakeholders to engage in post-publication debates through our website’s feedback forms, letters to the editor, ensuring transparency and integrity in our publication process.
Handling Allegations of Misconduct: Allegations of research or publication misconduct are investigated in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The journal may request explanations from authors and institutions involved. If misconduct is confirmed, appropriate actions may include manuscript rejection, correction, retraction, or notification of relevant institutions. Full details are available in the journal’s Corrections, Retractions & Article Removal Policy.
Transparency and Accessibility: The publisher is committed to ensuring long-term accessibility and preservation of all published content through digital archiving systems.
Use of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies: The journal recognizes the increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies in scholarly communication. To ensure transparency and responsible use of such technologies in research and academic publishing, the journal has established a dedicated policy governing the use of AI tools in manuscript preparation, peer review, and editorial processes. The full policy on the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies is available in the journal’s Generative AI Policy.
Generative AI Policy
Policy on the Use of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies
Policy on the Use of Generative AI and AI-Assisted
Technologies The International Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal “ONE” recognizes that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and AI-assisted technologies are increasingly used in research and academic writing.
The journal supports the responsible and transparent use of such technologies while maintaining the integrity, originality, and accountability of scholarly work. This policy aims to ensure transparency in the use of generative AI within the processes of manuscript preparation, peer review, and scholarly publishing.
Use of Generative AI by Authors
Authors may use generative AI tools to assist with language editing, grammar correction, or improving readability of the manuscript. However, authors remain fully responsible for the content of their work. The use of AI must not compromise the originality, accuracy, or integrity of the research. Generative AI tools must not be used to fabricate data, generate scientific results, or produce misleading interpretations.
Disclosure of AI Use
If generative AI or AI-assisted technologies are used during manuscript preparation, authors must disclose this use in the manuscript. Disclosure should include:
- the name of the AI tool used
- the purpose of its use (e.g., language editing, text improvement).
This disclosure must be included in the Article Declarations block under the subheading “AI Use Disclosure”.
AI and Authorship
Generative AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors of a manuscript. Authorship implies accountability and responsibility for the work, which cannot be assumed by artificial intelligence systems. Only human contributors who meet the authorship criteria may be listed as authors.
Use of AI in Peer Review
Reviewers must not upload or share manuscripts under review with generative AI tools or external AI services. Manuscripts under peer review are confidential documents, and their content must not be processed by third-party systems that may store or reuse the information.
Editorial Use of AI
Editors may use AI tools for limited technical purposes such as plagiarism detection, language screening, or identifying potential ethical concerns. Editorial decisions are always made by human editors and are not delegated to artificial intelligence systems.
Transparency and Responsibility
The journal encourages responsible and transparent use of AI technologies in scholarly communication. All participants in the publication process are expected to ensure that AI-assisted technologies are used ethically and in accordance with established principles of academic integrity.
This policy applies to authors, reviewers, editors, and all participants involved in the journal’s publication process.
Editorial Policies
Editorial Policy Principles
Welcome to the “Editorial Policies” section of the International Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal “ONE”. Our commitment to scholarly integrity is the cornerstone of our publication philosophy. This section delineates the ethical standards and procedural guidelines that govern the conduct of all participants in the publication process of our journal.
These policies are aligned with internationally recognized standards of scholarly publishing, including the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Scope and Purpose:
These policies serve to ensure the integrity of our interdisciplinary academic exchange and uphold the highest standards of scientific research and publication.
Responsibilities of Authors:
Originality and Plagiarism: Authors are expected to submit original work and appropriately cite content from other sources. Plagiarism in all its forms is unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention: Authors may be asked to provide raw data related to their manuscript for editorial review. Authors are also expected to ensure that their research data is appropriately anonymized (if applicable) and stored securely to protect participant privacy and confidentiality.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication: Authors should not publish the same research in more than one journal as original work.
Acknowledgment of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All co-authors must approve the final manuscript before submission.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Authors must disclose any financial, personal, or professional relationships that could inappropriately influence (or appear to influence) their research or its interpretation. This information will be reviewed by the editorial team and published in the final article in the ‘Conflicts of Interest’ section (as part of the unified declarations/metadata block), to ensure transparency for readers and stakeholders.
Compliance with Ethical Standards: Authors must ensure that their manuscripts comply with the ethical standards described in the journal’s Publication Ethics policy.
Use of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies: Authors should ensure transparency in the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies during manuscript preparation.
Responsibilities of Editors:
Decision on the Manuscript: Editors are responsible for deciding which of the submitted papers should be published based on the validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers.
Confidentiality: Editors must treat received manuscripts for review as confidential documents.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by the editor for their own research without explicit written consent from the author. Editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where a conflict exists.
Editorial Independence: The editorial team operates independently from the publisher.
Responsibilities of Reviewers:
Double-blind peer review
Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and, through the editorial communications with the author, may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents.
Use of AI in Peer Review: Reviewers must not upload or share manuscripts under review with generative AI tools or external AI services, as manuscripts under review are confidential documents.
Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest, including financial, personal, or professional connections, and recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts where such conflicts exist.
Responsibilities of the Publisher:
Handling of Unethical Behavior in Publishing: The publisher, in collaboration with the editorial board, is committed to addressing cases of alleged or proven unethical behavior, including scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication, plagiarism, or inappropriate editorial practices. If such behavior involves the publisher itself, the journal will establish an independent review process to investigate the matter and take corrective actions to ensure transparency and accountability.
Plagiarism Screening: The journal applies similarity screening as part of the editorial assessment process and uses software such as iThenticate and StrikePlagiarism to identify potential overlap, duplication, or other forms of textual similarity, in accordance with the journal’s Publication Ethics policy.
Post-Publication Amendments and Retractions: In cases of proven misconduct, errors, or ethical violations affecting the reliability, integrity, or validity of the scientific content, the publisher will work closely with the editorial board to take corrective actions. These actions may include issuing corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or article removal where appropriate. All such actions are undertaken in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to maintain the integrity of the academic record. In exceptional circumstances, an article may be withdrawn from publication for administrative or contractual reasons related to the publishing agreement, including failure to fulfill obligations under the Article Processing Charge policy. Such withdrawal is administrative in nature and does not relate to the scientific content, validity, or integrity of the research.
Access to Journal Content: The publisher ensures the permanent availability and long-term preservation of scholarly research by partnering with reliable digital archiving systems. This commitment safeguards accessibility for future generations of researchers and readers.
Transparency and Open Communication:
The journal encourages scholarly debate and promotes transparency in the research process by enabling open communication and ethical discussion between all involved parties.
By visiting this section, authors, editors, and reviewers agree to abide by these policies, ensuring that Journal continues to serve as a beacon of high-quality, ethical, and influential scholarly publishing.
Complaints and Appeals:
The journal has a clear procedure for handling complaints and appeals from authors, reviewers, and editors concerning the handling of manuscripts or published content.
Open access
Free Dissemination of Knowledge and Ensuring Global Accessibility
The journal follows the Open Access policy and provides immediate, free, and permanent access to its content under the Gold Open Access model. Publishing costs are covered primarily through Article Processing Charges (APCs). The journal does not charge subscription fees or pay-per-view fees for readers. Editorial decisions are based solely on the scholarly merit, originality, and relevance of submitted manuscripts and are not influenced by APCs, fee waivers, or any other financial considerations. All articles are made permanently and freely available on the official journal website immediately after publication. Full-text access to the journal’s scientific articles is provided online in the Archives section.
The licensing policy of the journal is compatible with major open access and archiving principles. Authors whose articles are published in open access retain copyright to their work, while granting the publisher the right of first publication. Open access articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license, which permits copying, adaptation, distribution, display, republication, and reuse for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate attribution is given.
Copyright and Licensing
View Licensing and Copyright Terms
Authors whose articles are published in Open Access retain all copyrights and grant the journal the right to publish original scientific articles containing the results of experimental and theoretical research that have not been considered for publication in other journals.
The author warrants that the submitted material:
– does not infringe the copyright of any other person or organization;
– has not been previously published by other publishers or submitted for publication to other publications.
The rights granted by the author to the Editorial Board of International Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal “Expert” include, in particular, the rights to:
– publication of the article in the electronic version of the journal and its distribution;
– translation of the article for inclusion in the electronic version of the journal and distribution of the translated content, provided the author has agreed to this process with the editorial board in advance;
– distribution of the electronic version of the article, including any translations, through various electronic channels (posting on the journal’s official website, electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right, after the publication of the article in the journal, without the consent of the Editorial Board and the Founder:
– to use the materials of the article, in whole or in part, for educational purposes;
– to use the materials in the article, in whole or in part, for their own dissertation;
– to use the materials in the article to prepare abstracts, conference proceedings, and oral presentations;
– in all cases, a bibliographic reference to the article or a hyperlink to its electronic copy on the official website of the journal is mandatory.
The author, after submitting the article to the journal’s editorial board, commits to maintaining the confidentiality of the text concerning third parties not involved in the publication process until a decision regarding the article’s acceptance is communicated.
Open Access Articles (Open Access policy)
Open access articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0. This license allows others to distribute, edit, modify, and build upon your work, even for commercial purposes, as long as you provide proper attribution.
Authors’ responsibilities
Authors must guarantee that the work presented is original and has not been published elsewhere in any language. If authors have used the work and/or words of others, appropriate references should be provided.
Authors of original research should accurately describe the work performed and characterize its significance. The text of the research should include sufficiently detailed information and references. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable.
An author should not submit text describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. Simultaneous submission of a manuscript to more than one journal is unethical and unacceptable.
Proper acknowledgement of the work of others should always be included in the submitted research paper. Authors should identify and cite publications that have influenced their research.
Authors should also take into account the following: the Editorial Board of the journal strictly controls excessive (no more than 5 references) and unjustified citation of their own publications; in case of detection of such phenomena, such articles will not be accepted for publication.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a substantial contribution to the conception, design, or interpretation of the research presented. All those who have made substantial contributions should be listed as co-authors. Applicable copyright laws and conventions must be followed.
Digital Archiving & Preservation Policy
Internet Archive
The International Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal “One” ensures the long-term digital preservation and accessibility of its published content. The journal recognizes long-term digital preservation as a critical component of maintaining the integrity and continuity of the scholarly record.
The journal participates in independent third-party archiving through the Internet Archive, an open digital library providing long-term preservation of scholarly materials.
Published articles and journal metadata are deposited and made publicly accessible via the Internet Archive to support long-term preservation and continued availability of the scholarly record in the event of technical failure, website disruption, or other unforeseen circumstances.
Public Archival RecordsJournal archival records deposited in the Internet Archive are publicly accessible through the journal’s Internet Archive archive.
The archive contains deposited full-text articles and related metadata of the journal.
Digital preservation copies stored within the Internet Archive operate independently of the journal’s primary hosting infrastructure, ensuring that published materials remain accessible even if the journal website becomes temporarily or permanently unavailable.
Preservation ObjectivesThis archiving practice supports:
- permanent open access to published content
- independent third-party preservation
- long-term digital sustainability of the scholarly record
- redundancy through independent web archiving systems
The publisher is committed to maintaining digital preservation practices consistent with internationally recognized standards for open-access scholarly publishing.
Complementary Indexing and DiscoveryThe digital preservation infrastructure described above operates alongside the journal’s indexing and abstracting services. While indexing databases facilitate the discoverability and citation tracking of published research, independent archival systems ensure the long-term preservation and accessibility of the scholarly record. Information about the journal’s current indexing and abstracting services is provided in the dedicated Indexing & Abstracting section of the journal website.